When one comes to Saint Mary’s, one joins an academic community whose core values are fairness, mutual respect, trust, and honesty. To accomplish its mission to awaken, nurture and empower learners to ethical lives of service and leadership, the Saint Mary’s community depends on the personal responsibility and integrity of all its members. Academic integrity should not be understood as merely following certain rules; rather, it is a way of acting based on shared values that lies at the heart of any academic endeavor. A commitment to academic integrity facilitates the pursuit of knowledge and understanding by providing a framework for the open, honest and respectful exchange of ideas and information. It fosters creativity and critical thinking; it allows students to develop the self-confidence that comes from acquiring academic skills; it provides correct information to instructors so that they can give appropriate feedback in the essential relationship between students and teachers; and, ultimately, it ensures the integrity of the Saint Mary’s degree.
Students at Saint Mary’s University are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. Academic dishonesty, in any form, will not be tolerated and will subject the student to disciplinary sanctions up to and including dismissal. Academic dishonesty comes in a variety of forms. Forms of academic dishonesty include but are not limited to, plagiarism, fabrication, abuse of Internet sources, cheating, lying, falsified transcripts, and academic misconduct.
- Plagiarism is the presentation of someone else’s words, ideas or data as one’s own. When a student submits work that includes the words, ideas or data of others, the source of that information must be acknowledged through complete, accurate and specific citations, as well as quotation marks if verbatim statements are included. By placing his/her name on work submitted, the student certifies the originality of all work not otherwise identified by appropriate acknowledgments. Examples of plagiarism include copying someone else’s previously prepared material such as lab reports, class papers, etc.; copying a paragraph or even sentences from other works; and self-plagiarism (turning in for new credit your own work from a previous class without authorization).
- Fabrication is the intentional use of invented information or the falsification of research or other findings with the intent to deceive. Examples include the citation of information not taken from the source indicated; submission in a lab report of falsified, invented or fictitious data; submitting as the student’s own work prepared by another, including purchasing or downloading from the Internet; and falsely representing hours or experience in a field experience or internship.
- Abuse of Internet sources is the acquisition or presentation of information obtained by purchase or downloaded for free from the Internet without explicit written acknowledgment of the source. Examples include submission of a paper prepared by other persons or agencies, including commercial organizations; and the combination of passages from various sources presented as one’s own thoughts or analysis.
- Cheating is an act or attempted act of deception by which a student seeks to misrepresent that he/she has mastered information on an academic exercise that he/she has not mastered. Examples include copying from another student’s test; allowing another student to copy from a test paper; taking a test for someone else; collaborating during a test or assignment with another student by giving or receiving information without the instructor’s permission; or using notes when disallowed.
- Lying is giving false or misleading information to gain an academic advantage.
- Academic misconduct is the intentional violation of university policies by tampering with grades or taking part in obtaining or distributing any part of an administered test. Examples include accessing academic files without appropriate permission; duplicating computer software that has been copyrighted; and forging another person’s signature.
- Self-plagiarism, also referred to as text recycling or “double-dipping,” is a form of academic dishonesty. Self-plagiarism is defined as using an assignment (either in part or in full) submitted for one class to fulfill the requirements of another assignment, in the same class or a different class, without program approval. The same written work should never be submitted twice without the program’s permission; doing so prevents students from engaging with the course material and does not demonstrate new learning. Exceptions to this policy, e.g., allowing reuse of previous work for a thesis or dissertation, are at the program’s discretion.
The University uses third party review software to ensure academic integrity and to support student learning regarding the appropriate use of source material. Each program with approval from the respective Deans and Academic Deans, determine their implementation of anti-plagiarism third party tools. Student papers may also be submitted for review by the University at any time.
Instructors report suspicion of academic dishonesty to the program director. Adjudication of incidences of academic dishonesty are made by the program director or Dean using Maxient, an online tool for centralized reporting and record keeping of academic integrity infringements. If the student is cleared of the academic dishonesty, the record in Maxient will be removed. If the incident was ambiguous and no decisions or sanctions were determined, the record will read - no action. If it is determined the student plagiarized the program director will identify the level and the subsequent sanction. Program Directors should complete the Incident Report Form, found in Maxient, within seven (7) work days of an instructor reporting suspicion of academic dishonesty.
The program director and instructor will determine if the plagiarism meets the definition of minor, moderate, or major plagiarism. Levels of infractions:
- Minor infractions occur when the text is not a part of a culminating project (e.g., not a capstone, thesis, or dissertation) AND the student has paraphrased carelessly. For example: one or two sections of the source material may be patched together without quotation marks, or a few words are changed but the style and structure remain too close to the source. The student may or may not have acknowledged the source.
- Moderate infractions occur when the text is not a part of a culminating project (e.g., not a capstone, thesis, or dissertation) AND the student has copied multiple passages from a source(s), with no apparent attempt at paraphrasing. The student may or may not have acknowledged the source. This copying may include self-plagiarism, defined as submitting work from a previous class for new credit (see SMUMN policy on self-plagiarism), or collusion (working with others but presenting the assignment as individual work).
- Major infractions occur when the text is a part of a culminating project (e.g., capstone, thesis, or dissertation) OR the majority of the submission consists of work, either published or unpublished, that was created by someone else.
The number of instances of plagiarism will be calculated across courses rather than only within individual courses, i.e., a student’s second instance might occur in a different course than the first instance.
If the plagiarism is determined to be minor, the instructor meets with the student to provide a fair opportunity for response to the allegation. If the instructor determines that academic dishonesty has occurred, the student will complete the Avoiding Plagiarism module, offered by the Writing Center. The module must be completed in 7 days. At completion of the module, the student will present the certificate of completion to the program director. If the student does not complete, they fail the assignment. If this is the first instance of plagiarism in the student’s coursework at Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, the student will be given the opportunity to resubmit the assignment or complete another assignment for a minimum passing grade (D for undergraduate course and a C for a graduate course). If infraction occurs on a discussion board, the student must complete another assignment for a minimum passing grade (D for undergraduate course and a C for a graduate course). The due date of the makeup assignment is determined by the instructor. If this is the student’s second instance at the SGPP, the program director meets with the student and the student will receive a zero for the assignment. If this is the student’s third instance at the SGPP, the student will fail the course. If this is the student’s fourth instance, they will be referred to the Dean who will determine the sanction, which could include dismissal from the University.
If the plagiarism is determined to be moderate, the program director meets with the student to provide a fair opportunity for response to the allegation. If the program director determines that academic dishonesty has occurred, the student will complete the Avoiding Plagiarism module, offered by the Writing Center. The module must be completed in 7 days. At completion of the module, the student will present the certificate of completion to the program director. If this is the first instance of moderate plagiarism in the student’s coursework at Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, the student will receive a zero for the assignment. If this is the student’s second instance minor or moderate plagiarism, the student will fail the course. If this is the student’s third instance of minor or moderate plagiarism, they will be referred to the Dean who will determine the sanction, which could include dismissal from the University.
If the plagiarism is determined to be major, the program director, or their designate, meets with the student to provide a fair opportunity for response to the allegation. If the program director determines that academic dishonesty occurred and if the major infraction was not a culminating project for the student’s program, the student will fail the course. If the major infraction was on a culminating project, or this is the second major infraction on a non-culminating project, the program director, with input from the students committee, will forward the outcome of the meeting to the Dean who will determine the sanction, which could include dismissal from the University.
Change in appeal process for plagiarism
The Program Director or School Dean will record their decision in Maxient and write a letter outlining their decision and subsequent sanctions. This letter, the Student Outcome Letter, will be sent to students through the Maxient tool. The student may appeal the judgment or sanctions. The appeal must be received within seven (7) days of the student receiving the Student Outcome Letter. The student must provide a written justification for the appeal plus copies of all supporting documents to the School Dean if the Program Director determine the judgement and to the Vice Provost of Faculties and Academic Affairs if the student is not satisfied with the School Dean’s review of the appeal or the School Dean determined the original judgement.
The university reserves the right to revoke a degree if it discovers academic dishonesty that may have impacted the award of the degree initially.
As members of a Lasallian community of scholars, students are expected to adhere to the highest levels of respect and professionalism in all interactions with other members of the university community or with individuals at practicum, internship, student teaching, etc., sites. In cases where a student’s behavior is not professional or is disrespectful toward others within the university community, the student may be subject to disciplinary action. Complaints about unethical, unprofessional, or disrespectful behavior must be made, in writing, to the program director. The program director will notify the dean of the allegation.
To determine if disciplinary action is appropriate, a disciplinary hearing will be held by an appointed committee. The committee conducting the hearing will be chaired by the program director of the program in which the student is enrolled. Other members of the committee will be a representative from the university community chosen by the student and an administrator or staff member selected by the dean. The dean may attend the hearing as an interested party, but is not a member of the committee.
At the hearing, the student may address the allegations and respond to questions from committee members. The committee may hear from other appropriate individuals. At the conclusion of the hearing, the committee will discuss the allegations, determine if the allegations are supported by a prepomdeance of the evidence, and then determine if disciplinary action should be recommended to the dean.
The dean will review the committee’s recommendation and make decisions regarding disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal. The dean will notify the student. Students may appeal to the vice provost.
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota reserves the right to take disciplinary action against a student for his or her behavior independent of a written complaint and independent of this procedure.
Policy on Children and Guests in the Classroom
The primary mission of the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs at Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota is to educate graduate and degree completion students. To that end, Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs have the responsibility to provide a place of instruction that is free from internal as well as external distraction and conducive to learning. To provide a place of instruction which is free from distraction requires that some restrictions be placed on children and guests in the classroom and on campus. In addition to concerns about the ability to carry out Schools of Graduate and Professional Program’s mission, the presence of children and guests in classrooms and in campus facilities raises safety and liability issues.
This policy addresses the presence of children and guests in classrooms and on the campus and provides guidance for students and employees of the School of Graduate and Professinal Programs.
First and foremost, the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs and its facilities (classrooms, offices, public service areas and grounds) should not be viewed as a substitute for child care arrangements. An adult may bring children to campus for visits, when the reason for the child’s presence is to take the place of child care services, then it is inappropriate for the child to be on campus.
Second, at no time may children be unattended or unsupervised on campus. The terms “unattended” and “unsupervised” are used to refer to situations in which the child is on campus or in a campus facility and is not under the immediate physical control of an adult or an instructor. As a practical matter, children may not be left unattended in public areas while the adult is in class. Nor may a child be left to wait or play outside a classroom while the accompanying adult is in class.
Third, only enrolled students may be present in classrooms. Guests and children may not attend class with enrolled students. The presence of children in class is often a disruptive factor, not just because a child might be noisy or active, but because inadvertently attention is centered on the child rather than on the teaching/learning process. Moreover, children may not be present at the employee’s work site during an employee’s assigned work hours. This does not preclude short visits when the child is accompanied by another responsible adult.
Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs instructors and staff must advise students that it is a violation of Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs policy to allow children in the classroom. Students who do not comply with a request to remove children from class will be dealt with in accordance with the Student Behavior Policy.
Finally, as a safety measure, Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs employees and students should not allow children to be left unattended on campus. Staff or students who observe children who appear to be unattended should contact Campus Security. Campus Security may contact local law enforcement to handle the situation.
It is a violation of federal law to reproduce or share copyrighted materials, print or digital, without appropriate permission. Sharing materials includes posting content online but does not include sharing links to material posted online by another party. Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota considers a violation of copyright law to be academic misconduct.
The Fair Use provision of copyright law permits students to make and distribute copies of traditionally copyrighted materials without seeking permission from the copyright holder in situations related to teaching, scholarship, and research. All decisions to share copyrighted material must be determined on a case-by-case basis, using the fair use factors. Students who determine that their use of copyrighted materials meets fair use guidelines must attribute (cite) the original source. Students may contact the Twin Cities Campus Library for additional information and for a copy of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 U.S.C. § 101).
The University will purchase all proprietary computer software or site licenses. The use of copied software on any university equipment is prohibited.
Updated March 19, 2015
Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Collection of Data from Human Participants
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs at Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota is responsible for the review of all research involving human participants conducted at or sponsored by the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs. Research may be conducted by students, faculty, staff, or outside entities. This policy includes but is not limited to data collection for class assignments, capstone projects, master’s integrative papers or theses, and dissertations. Additional approvals may be required for research which involves the cooperation of external institutions or agencies.
The IRB seeks to assure that research with human participants is conducted in accordance with legal requirements and ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence and justice. These principles require the balancing of risks to participants against the scientific knowledge to be gained and the potential benefits to participants and society. This policy is not meant to prevent access to information or opinions within the scope of critical inquiry and scholarship. All applicants for IRB review and all faculty members supervising research submitted for IRB review must complete the Collaborative Institute Training Initiative (CITI) research ethics course.
All research projects must be reviewed and approved by the IRB prior to the collection of any data from human participants for research purposes. Complete instructions for the preparation of an IRB application may be accessed on-line at Blackboard. After initial review of a submitted research proposal, the IRB will determine whether the research project is 1) exempt from IRB review, 2) subject to expedited IRB review, or 3) subject to full IRB review.
Electronic Communication Policy
Saint Mary’s University recognizes that individuals occasionally have a situation in which they need to be accessible to their employers and/or families during scheduled class time. In addition, some individuals’ employment or personal responsibilities require that they be accessible at all times. Cellular telephones and personal paging devices are the primary method used to ensure this communication linkage.
However, the persistent use of such devices can be disruptive to the classroom environment. Therefore, individuals who have this kind of communication need should notify their instructor. They should reduce and/or eliminate audible signals and respond to non-emergency calls during classroom breaks and take all calls outside of the classroom.
Students at off-campus locations should follow the policies of the location which may prohibit use of cell phones.
Staff are encouraged to discuss the use of such devices as part of faculty orientation. Faculty are encouraged to discuss the use of such devices as part of the course overview.
Good Name Policy
Members of the university community recognize that freedom means the acknowledgment of responsibility to the subjects used in classroom discussions. Students and faculty are responsible for protecting the good name of any organization under discussion. They should communicate no information that either implicitly or explicitly impugns the good name of an organization, person, place, or thing being discussed or studied.
Conflict of Interest
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota seeks to avoid conflicts of interest in teaching and advising. A conflict of interest occurs when a student or employee of the university is engaged in both a teaching or advising relationship and a familial, cohabitational, supervisory, financial, professional, or personal relationship with another student or employee of the university. Examples of conflicts of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Use of class lists to solicit business for purposes other than university business.
- Duality of relationships within coursework, advisement, and/or professional organizations.
- Any present or past relationship that causes discomfort for either party to the relationship.
Any student or employee of the university will immediately notify the program director or a university administrator if a conflict of interest has developed in a teaching or advising relationship. The program director or university administrator will take action as appropriate.
Student Complaint Policy and Procedure
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota (SMUMN) is committed to respecting all members of our university community and providing a quality educational experience for all students. The objective of the Student Complaint Policy and Procedure is to ensure that the concerns and complaints of undergraduate or graduate students are addressed fairly and are resolved promptly. Complaints related to this policy are usually the result of behavior that the student feels is unjust, inequitable, or creates an unnecessary hardship.
Students may file complaints if they believe a problem is not governed by SMUMN other complaint or appeal procedures. Many of the other complaint policies may be found in the SMUMN Vice Provost for Enrollment Management (School of Graduate and Professional Programs) or the Dean of Students (College). After consulting with the student, the Vice Provost for Enrollment Management or their representatives will direct the student to the most appropriate procedure.
Whenever possible, students are encouraged to seek an informal resolution of the matter directly with the faculty or individual(s) involved. Often a complaint can be resolved in this way. However, if an informal approach is neither successful nor advisable, the student should use the following procedure:
- A student complaint form should be submitted to the Vice Provost for Enrollment Management or the Dean of Students. It should contain (at a minimum) the date and time of the alleged conflict or action, the reason(s) for the complaint, a summary of the complaint, a list of other persons who may provide information and any appropriate documentation. The student must also include the resolution or outcome he or she is seeking. The complaint must be submitted within ten (10) business days of the alleged conflict or action.
- Upon receipt of a completed form, a conference will take place with the student and the Vice Provost for Enrollment Management or the Dean of Students or their designees.
- The Vice Provost for Enrollment Management or the Dean of Students or their designees will notify appropriate persons and request any information or documentation needed to resolve the complaint.
- The Vice Provost for Enrollment Management or the Dean of Students or their designees may attempt to resolve the complaint by encouraging discussion between the student(s) and the faculty member/administrator or by taking the appropriate action to resolve the complaint.
- A review of the complaint with the supervisor(s) or others in the line of supervision may be used when deemed appropriate and beneficial to the process.
- All relative documentation and possible outcomes must be submitted by the student or other appropriate persons within ten (10) business days of the date the complaint is filed.
- When possible, the final resolution (or a finding of “unresolved”) will be filed in the Dean of Students office or the Student Services Office within fifteen (15) business days of the date the complaint is filed. If there are circumstances requiring an extension of this deadline, the staff member assigned to the complaint will notify the parties involved.
- If the student is not satisfied with the outcome of the complaint, a committee will be appointed to review the information and render a final decision. The committee will consist of representatives appointed by the Vice Provost for the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs, the Vice Provost for Academic Affairs (College), and the Vice President for Student Life. Their decision will be final.
A record of all complaints and their resolution will be documented and the records will be kept in the Dean of Students’ office on the Winona campus and the Student Services Office on the Twin Cities campus.
A grievance is a complaint that may result in disciplinary action against a staff member or student. This grievance procedure only applies where no other university policy provides a process for addressing the subject matter of the grievance.
In order to encourage attention to individual concerns, the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs has developed this grievance procedure. The university believes that concerns ought to be handled at the lowest possible level of organizational structure. A grievant who wish to address concerns will observe the following procedures:
- The grievant should discuss the matter with the student, faculty, or staff member concerned.
- If a satisfactory resolution is not achieved, the grievant will discuss the matter with his or her program director. The program director will attempt to resolve the issue between the student, faculty, or staff member.
- If a satisfactory resolution is not achieved, a dean will attempt to resolve the issue.
- If a satisfactory resolution is still not achieved, the dean will forward a written statement describing the grievance to the vice president.
- Upon receiving the dean’s statement, the vice president will review the grievance, make a decision, and impose sanctions, if necessary, within a reasonable time. Sanctions may include any action up to and including expulsion, termination, and legal action.
- If either party is not satisfied with the vice president’s decision, that party must, within 15 days, submit to the vice president a written request to establish an ad hoc committee of individuals from the university community. The student may select a peer advocate to serve as a member of the committee. The committee will determine its own procedures to hear the case. The case will be heard within a reasonable time. The committee then has a reasonable time to complete its deliberations. A majority vote of the committee is needed to make a recommendation on the grievance.
- The committee shall notify all parties of its recommendation.
- The vice provost will confirm or modify the recommendation, and notify the parties involved and the student of the decision.
- The decision of the vice provost is final.
The grievance procedure must be initiated within four months of the event causing the grievance.
Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, and Sexual Assault Policy
The university’s Discrimination, Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Policy may be found on the university’s Title IX Coordinator webpage at https://www.smumn.edu/about/offices/title-ix-coordinator
Romantic and Sexual Relationships Policy
Long-established standards of professional ethics discourage personal relationships of a romantic or sexual nature between persons who are in a supervisor-subordinate relationship on campus, especially between faculty or staff personnel and students. No non-academic or personal ties should be allowed to interfere with the academic integrity of the teacher-student relationship or the general integrity of the supervisor-subordinate working relationship at Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota. With respect to sexual relationships, in particular, what might appear to be consensual, even to the parties involved, may, in fact, not be so due to the inherent differential in authority.
On this basis, the university prohibits any faculty or staff member of the university from engaging in romantic or sexual conduct, or a romantic or sexual relationship with any undergraduate student currently enrolled at the university.
Furthermore, the university prohibits any faculty or staff member of the university from engaging in romantic or sexual conduct, or a romantic or sexual relationship with any graduate student whom the faculty or staff member educates, counsels, supervises or evaluates in any way.
Likewise, the university prohibits any faculty or staff member from engaging in romantic or sexual conduct, or a romantic or sexual relationship with any faculty or staff member whom that person supervises or evaluates in any way.
Exceptions to any of these prohibitions will be considered by the EEO Officer on a limited, case-by-case basis. If a faculty or staff member has questions about the application or effect of this policy to an existing or potential relationship, it is the faculty or staff member’s duty to consult with his or her supervisor and/or the EEO Officer.
If charges of sexual harassment are made, the existence of a romantic or sexual relationship in any of the contexts stated above shall not be a defense in any proceeding unless an exception to the prohibitions herein has been made as outlined above. In addition, the university will not defend a faculty or staff member against sexual harassment charges based upon the existence of a romantic or sexual relationship unless an exception to the prohibitions herein has been made as outlined above. Individuals who violate this policy are subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination.
Workplace Violence Policy
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota is committed to providing faculty, staff, and students with an environment that is safe, secure, and free from threats, harassment, intimidation, and violence. Employees play a major role in the university’s efforts by complying with this policy, contributing to a respectful atmosphere, treating all threats seriously, and reporting incidents immediately.
The university will treat all reports of threatening behavior or violence seriously and will investigate them. The university reserves the right to search any area in order to investigate reports of workplace violence.
Prohibited Conduct and Behavior
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota will not tolerate any workplace violence, whether carried out by employees, students, visitors, former employees, or other individuals. The university expressly prohibits violence, threats, harassment, intimidation, and other disruptive behavior on its property. Violence or disruptive behavior can include physical acts of violence, gestures, intimidating presence, oral or written statements, harassing telephone calls, stalking, expressions that communicate a direct or indirect threat of physical harm, and weapons possession.
The university will investigate all reports of such incidents and will initiate appropriate action, which may include immediate removal from university property, suspension, termination and/or referral for criminal prosecution. All employees are required to cooperate in any investigations the university conducts in response to reports or acts of workplace violence. This policy applies to all work locations including, but not limited to offices, work sites, classrooms, residence halls, vehicles, and field locations.
All employees are responsible for reporting workplace violence and can do so without the fear of reprisal or criticism. Members of the university community should report incidents or violent, threatening, harassing, intimidating or other disruptive behavior as outlined below:
Any act of violence or threat of violence, or any emergency situation:
- Winona Campus Safety (Ext. 1703)
- Twin Cities Campus Security (Ext. 5159)
Verbal abuse, perceived intimidation, or harassment, or any non-emergency situation:
- Report incident to immediate supervisor or the vice president for the area.
All other situations or not sure — call:
- Winona Campus Safety (800) 635-5987 (Ext. 1703)
- Twin Cities Campus Security (866) 497-8788 (Ext. 5159)
The university will treat all reports with integrity and discretion.
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota prohibits the possession of firearms, fireworks, knives, air- or gas-operated weapons, stun guns, bows or arrows, or weapons of any kind (including martial arts weapons) on the Twin Cities Campus and any sites operated by the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs.
The possession or use of a weapon on the Twin Cities Campus or any university site may lead to dismissal. Licensed peace officers may carry their firearms while on the Twin Cities Campus.
Suspected weapons possession should be reported to Campus Security.
Drug and Alcohol Policy
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota supports the principles of a society working toward the amelioration of problems related to illicit drugs, alcohol abuse and addiction, and prescription drug abuse and addiction.
The university prohibits student and employees from unlawfully manufacturing, distributing, possessing or using alcohol or illicit drugs on its property, in the workplace, or as part of any university activities. An employee criminally convicted of unlawfully manufacturing, distributing, possessing or using alcohol or illicit drugs in the workplace or on university property must report that conviction to his/her vice president within five days of the conviction. Within 10 days of receiving notice that an employee has been so criminally convicted, the university will notify any granting federal agency. A student criminally convicted of unlawfully manufacturing, distributing, possessing or using alcohol or illicit drugs on the university’s property or as part of a university activity must report that conviction to the Vice President for Student Development on the Winona campus or the Academic Dean on the Twin Cities campus, as applicable, within five days of the conviction. Employees of the university shall not furnish underage students of the university with alcohol. Employees of the university shall not furnish any students of the university with illicit drugs.
Any employee found in violation of this policy may be immediately suspended, placed on probation or immediately terminated from employment. Any disciplinary action will follow the process outlined in the university’s employee handbooks. Any student found in violation of this policy may be suspended, placed on disciplinary probation, or expelled from the university. Any disciplinary action will follow the processes outlined for student discipline.
The university does seek to be supportive of employees who experience personal difficulties with drug or alcohol abuse. The university will attempt to help any employee who seeks assistance with a drug and/or alcohol problem without jeopardy to employment. In the event of placement in residential treatment, the university will hold the employee’s position until residential treatment has been completed. Following treatment, the university will attempt to be as flexible as possible in accommodating the employee’s needs for aftercare. In the event of outpatient treatment, the university will allow an employee to adjust temporarily his/her work schedule to accommodate outpatient treatment needs, if appropriate.
The university fundamentally recognizes the importance of every employee and student. When a problem arises as a result of drug or alcohol use, the university will make every effort to balance the employee’s or student’s concerns with the concerns of the university community and applicable legal parameters. If the university believes that the rights and needs of others are being violated as a result of an employee’s or student’s drug or alcohol problems, or if available assistance has been rejected, termination of employment or expulsion from the university may result.
Consistent with the educational nature of the institution, the university will make available to its students and employees, information, and referrals related to the prevention of and intervention for alcohol and drug problems.
The university recognizes the right of persons to use alcohol within the limitations of state law and local ordinances. However, the use of alcohol on university premises, other than residence halls, by faculty, students or staff members is limited to specific university-sponsored events with the prior approval of the appropriate vice president.
Behavior, suspected of being attributable to or influenced by alcohol or controlled substances, that disrupts or interferes, in any way, with the atmosphere conducive to teaching and learning should be reported to the person immediately in charge of the situation. If the offending behavior is that of a student, the faculty member should be notified. The faculty member should then seek assistance from a university administrator. If the offending behavior is that of a faculty member, the appropriate dean, a program director, or another university administrator should be notified. If the offending behavior is that of a staff member, the individual’s supervisor should be notified.
Actions taken by university administration for such behavior may include, but are not limited to:
- Removal of the individual from the immediate teaching, learning or work setting.
- Dismissal of the affected class if a faculty member is involved.
- Discussion of the behavior with the individual by appropriate university administrators and recommendation of remedial measures.
- Follow-up measures by the university, including ongoing monitoring, as determined on a case-by-case basis.
Health Risks Associated with Alcohol and Other Drugs
Information about the health risks associated with drug and alcohol use and abuse can be accessed at: http://www.nida.nih.gov
Information about Minnesota controlled substance crimes and penalties can be found at: http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/152/
Policy on the Appropriate Use of Technology Resources
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota recognizes that technology resources can be a means for intellectual, social, cultural growth, but said resources can also be a means for harassment and destructiveness. As a Catholic institution, the university has an obligation to encourage civility and respect in the use of technology resources. Consequently, members of the university community – students, faculty, and staff – are expected to exercise responsibility, operate technology resources ethically, respect the rights and privacy of others, and operate within the bounds of the law and of university policy and standards when using university technology resources.
The use of technology resources at the university is a privilege.
The university reserves the right to restrict the use of its technology resources and limit access to the same when faced with violations of federal or state laws or university policies or standards. The university reserves the right to inspect software, files, and materials stored on or transmitted by university technology resources. The university reserves the right to remove or limit access to material posted on or transmitted by its technology resources.
Technology resources include the university’s computing facilities, its electronic mail system, its voice mail system, and Internet access.
Responsibilities of Each Technology Resources User
I. Appropriate Use of Technology Resources
- Each user must use technology resources for the purposes for which they are intended. The university maintains technology resources for the purposes of conducting and fostering the instructional, educational, and research activities of the university as well as furthering the business interests of the university. Users will not use technology resources for commercial purposes or unauthorized financial gain. Users will not use technology resources for political purposes.
- Each user must use appropriate language when using technology resources. Appropriate language is language that reflects the academic and institutional values of the university. Users will not send harassing, intimidating and/or threatening messages through electronic mail, voice mail or other means.
- Each user must use technology resources consistent with local, state, and federal laws. Users must comply with federal copyright law in their use of technology resources. Users who repeatedly infringe on the copyrights of others may have their access to technology resources terminated. Unless authorized by the software developer, users may not reproduce computer software or its related documentation. Users will only use computer software in accordance with license agreements, whether the software is licensed to the university or to them.
- Each user must use technology resources consistent with the limited availability of said resources. Academic use will be the first priority for computing facilities. Users will not initiate or encourage the promulgation of chain letters, unauthorized automated or mass postings, or other types of unauthorized large scale distributions. Users will not use technology resources in a way that is wasteful of any resource, including processor, memory, disk storage, or input/output resources.
- Each user must respect the physical security of technology resources. Users will not create or release computer viruses or engage in other destructive or potentially destructive programming activities. Users will not disrupt the timeshare functions or network traffic by recklessly or intentionally overloading the system or otherwise deny or restrict the access of others. Users will not modify, alter or otherwise tamper with systems hardware or software unless explicitly authorized to do so. Users will not tamper with terminals, microcomputers, printers or any other associated university-owned equipment. Removal of computer equipment, disks, ribbons, paper, or documentation from a computing facility, without authorization, constitutes theft. Users will be prosecuted accordingly.
- Users of the university’s technology resources assume full responsibility for their experiences. The university cannot and will not protect users against the existence or receipt of material that may be offensive to them except in cases of violation of the law or of university policy or standards, and then only when technically feasible. Individuals using technology resources are warned that they may willingly or unwillingly receive or discover material that they find offensive.
- By using the university technology resources, user agrees to identify, defend (with counsel acceptable to the university) and hold harmless the university, its trustees, officers and employees against any and all claims for injury to person or damage to property (including claims of employees of user) associated with the user’s use of the university’s technology resources.
- The university requires that users of technology resources demonstrate respect for others, respect for the university, and respect for the values of a Catholic Lasallian university when using technology resources.
II. Account and System Security
- Users of the university’s technology resources are responsible for any activity that takes place through their account. Accordingly, each user should:
- Choose a secure password
- Not disclose that password to others
- Not share his/her account with anyone, without exception
- Always log out of his/her account
- Users of the university’s technology resources are responsible for maintaining a secure system environment. Accordingly, each user must:
- Immediately report security concerns to technology staff, an appropriate supervisor or an appropriate administrator
- Not modify or attempt to modify any technology resources equipment or software
- Not crash or attempt to crash technology resources systems
- Not circumvent or attempt to circumvent system security measures or restrictions
- Not access or attempt to access any unauthorized accounts, either internally or externally
- The university reserves the right to monitor the use of all the technology resources it provides or that are used within its jurisdiction or in its name. The university respects the privacy of users; however, users are advised that in an institutional setting, no absolute guarantee of privacy exists.
- Technology staff will investigate the inappropriate use of technology resources and will take appropriate action for account and system violations whenever said staff is notified of or observes such inappropriate use.
- The university will cooperate with local, state, and federal authorities investigating violations of local, state, or federal law involving technology resources of the university.
Recourse for Violations by Users
- Alleged violations of this policy by students on the Winona Campus will be investigated by the Office of the Vice President for Student Development or the Office of the Vice President for the College and the Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs, whichever office is most appropriate. Alleged violations of this policy by students on the Twin Cities Campus and all other university campuses or delivery sites will be investigated by the dean of the academic area. The technology resources staff will assist in investigations, as appropriate.
- Inappropriate use of technology resources by students in the College on the Winona Campus will be handled using the same disciplinary judicial process as is used for violations of the Student Handbook. Inappropriate use of technology resources by students of the Twin Cities Campus and all other university campuses or delivery sites will be handled using the Grievance Procedure from the most recent Twin Cities Campus Catalog and Student Handbook. The use of technology resources may be suspended during an investigation if technology resources staff reasonably believes that the inappropriate use of technology resources has occurred.
- Alleged violations of this policy by employees will be investigated by the employee’s supervisor. The supervisor will be assisted in the investigation, as appropriate, by the technology resources staff.
- Inappropriate use of technology resources by employees will be handled using the disciplinary process outlined in the Employee Handbook, the Faculty Handbook, or the Schools of Graduate Studies and Schools of Professional Programs Handbook, as appropriate.
- If a student violates this policy, he or she may face sanctions up to and including expulsion from the university. A student may lose computing privileges as a sanction for violation of this policy.
- If an employee violates this policy, he or she may face sanctions up to and including termination from employment at the university.
- The use of technology resources to commit an act of academic dishonesty may subject a student to separate sanctions for academic dishonesty and for violation of this policy.
- Students and employees may face civil and criminal consequences, independent of action by the university, if their inappropriate use of technology resources violates local, state, or federal law.